When I originally started this nine years ago, the more I
looked the more skeptical I became. I started picking apart EVPs. I when
through the whole history starting with Friedrich Jürgenson book and Konstantin
Raudives research. I found many discrepancies in the early experiments what we
now know to be RF contamination by using a germanium diode. Other experiments
were later done with the help of a Pye Records sound engineers, and AT&T Laboratories.
A.P. Hale, Physicist and Electronics Engineer stated:
In view of the tests carried out in a screened laboratory
at my firm, I cannot explain what happened in normal physical terms.
The owner of a bar gave me the opportunity to be in the
building after hours alone. I was more interested in the history than anything else;
it was once a stagecoach stop, and bordello. I walked in the bar turned on my
voice recorder before I marked my audio I got an EVP male voice: I’m going to
kill you my second EVP was female: It’s haunted. This amazed me, I started questioning everything reviewing all the skeptical explanations to explain the voices.
There is the question of why an apparition is described wearing clothing? The apparition is nothing more than mind a conscious form of energy, our physical self decays. The once living human being has been reduced to its last cognitive state. The entity projects an image of how it last perceived itself at the point of death. Throughout our day, all short-term memory is processed as long-term physical memory. As we sleep our brain cycles through memories reorganizing connections while strengthening proven connections between brain cells, and our synapses. We wake up feeling refreshed, and restored ready to begin the day. Our conscious self starts over. We make new choices; what to wear, what to do, with whom we will interact, and then consciously, and subconsciously, we organize our daily routine. Each day we start with a fresh perception of ourselves: how we look, what we wear, where we go. If you are nothing more than the sum of your experiences of the last day you lived, then you would project an image of how you last perceived yourself. This is why apparitions are depicted as having a human shape. We view ourselves as having a head, arms, and legs, and even visualize the clothes we last wore. As our presence disrupts the atmosphere surrounding our conscious self, we project the image as we last viewed ourselves.
I keep hearing about that overwhelming data. Research is never so one sided where is the data that has a less than favorable explanation. When did an alternative explanation in science become unpopular? How many of those scientists are getting a government paycheck to produce data claiming manmade Global Warming, now climate change, and how many would continue getting those checks if the data showed different results?
The lure of easy money, not to many organizations, again most with no business being in climate research, can walk away from FREE money. Then misleading the public with apocalyptic tales greenhouse gasses gone wrong, comparing Earth to Venus leaving out all those boring details. Case in point S.E.T.I. Search for extraterrestrial intelligence, my guess is that donations to look for E.T. must have dropped off, because now they're pushing the Global Warming agenda too.
Data compiled by Joanne Nova at the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. Why? 125 billion dollars annually from carbon credit commodities they're literally selling hot air. Billions of dollars spent on global warming/climate change buys a lot of confirmation bias.
The Venus Comparison: Cosmos
When arguing about the fate of our planet they quickly compare Earth to Venus as an example of a runaway greenhouse effect. It is like comparing an apple to an orange; the argument is that the apple was once an orange like Earth. They avoided facts like the lack of a strong planetary magnetic field. When the sun was younger ultraviolet rays and the solar winds were much stronger, freed gases such as hydrogen; the oceans if they had formed would have been swept into interplanetary space. Unlike Earth with its magnetosphere from our liquid iron core, which deflects the solar winds and protects us from solar and cosmic radiation. Then leaving out such details like Venus' rotation, which is longer than its year, and rotates backwards. The atmospheric pressure on Venus is about 90 times that of Earth. There was nothing to stop the solar winds and bombardment of radiation from destroying any chance for life. Therefore, no microbial life to absorb the CO2, no oceans, and no cliffs of Dover it just wasn't in the cards for Venus.
San Jose State University Global Warming on Venus in Perspective.
Senator James Inhofe stated in this video that all of the data from Al Gore's sci-fi movie has been overwhelmingly refuted.
In 1974-1977 scientists announced we're headed for another Ice Age, showing nobody really knows anything it's all one big guess. In Search Of..
Man made Global Warming is BULLSHIT !!! See how and why you are sold the lie of global warming to enslave you into a system of feudal serfdom. TV show Penn & Teller Bullshit!
Moreover, if we really are the cause of such environmental change, why is the entire inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) all heating up? There's no industrialization on those other planets emitting CO2, so what's causing them to warm? Much of the theories being broadcast to the public on this matter are junk science, by people appear to be far more interested in getting attention for their political beliefs, versus displaying all the evidence as opposed to only what the news media wants us to hear. The only real concern I have is why there aren't more people with good scientific educations speaking up about the fraud being perpetrated here? Why are we being lied to? Or is it just that most of the public is just too apathetic and ignorant to even study anything on their own?
by Dr. Barry Taff
The public because it doesn't directly affect their lives tend to ignore the rhetoric, everybody knows Al Gore is full of it, and Global Warming a fraud. I imagine it was embarrassing to hear about the ice was so thick in the arctic a team of Global Warming researcher had to be rescued. They're now pushing climate change so that if the ice caps don't melt and there is a drought some place on the planet it's climate change! They'll get their way because of the big money involved and the greed of Wall Street, and the Politicians.
Carbon taxes, and emission reduction for us. While China, and India build more, and more coal burning power plants. The government says we should lead by example, sacrificing our jobs to the rest of the world.
Climate Science has several problems.
First, labeling people who don’t accept, unquestioningly,
the premise and predictions of Climate Science as deniers is just begging for a
conflict. Just from a pure PR viewpoint, it is stupid and arrogant and not a
way to persuade anyone.
Second it has a history of failed predictions from both the
scientists and their proxies in the media. When you predict no snow, no rain,
ice free this and that and it doesn't pan out, it makes any reasonable person
wonder if you know what you are talking about.
Third, the hysterical proxies in the media. The Public Face
of climate science is Al Gore. You may say noooo! But he is. And Al Gore, being
a former politician, is automatically suspect in EVERYTHING he says. “We need
to outlaw SUVs” and “I had too much tea” have the same score on the BS meter.
To make it worse, he makes wild, outrageous doomsday claims that make even the
real scientists cringe.
Complicating all this is Mike Mann, another face of Climate
Science,who is behaving like a lunatic. His Hokey Stick is derided even by
climate scientists as shoddy and misleading. People who are paying attention to
this know this and are further jaded by the fact he hasn't been smacked down by
the scientific community.
Fourth, the proposed “solutions” to the issue are largely in
line with the extreme left…higher taxes, restrictions, rationing, prohibitions.
We have seen these policies advanced again and again in the past under the
guise of various political movements. Seeing them again under the guise of
“science” doesn't really pass the smell test.
Something else that doesn't pass the smell test is the very
idea that science is advanced enough to understand all the components,
dynamics, etc. of climate, let alone simulate it. A feeling supported by the
failure of the models to predict the cooling trend.
Fifth, no falsifiability. When EVERYTHING that happens is
caused by Global Warming, then NOTHING can prove AGW wrong. I recall one scientist
said if there was no warming in 5 years, then the models would be proven wrong.
Then it was ten years, then 15, etc. Moving the goal posts is a sure sign that
something isn't going as it was predicted.
I would really like to see some credible scientists lay out
a set of events or measurements that would prove AGW wrong. This is, after all,
is a key element of Science.
I’d say that at this point Climate Science is like
Economics. Loss of data, formulas and theories, but very little success in
explaining or predicting anything.
