Jackie Lives

The Queen Mary famous for its haunts, none more famous than Jacqueline “Jackie” Torin, who had believed to of drown in the second-class pool area. The pool long since removed was converted into the Royal Theater. There are numerous audio and video recording of the claimed responses of Jackie in the first-class pool area and boiler rooms. She was recorded calling out for her mommy, and singing London Bridges Falling Down in the April 1991 series Sightings with host and famed psychic-medium, Peter James.

RMS Queen Mary

Technology that was out of reach for most of us ten years ago such as Spectrum Analysis software is easily available today from FREE software like Audacity, to the more costly Adobe Audition, and others. It is easy enough to sample any digital sound source audio from digital voice recorders, or the audio track from video footage.

Spectrograms can be used to identify spoken words phonetically, which is the science of articulatory phonetics. The studying articulation, phoneticians explain how humans produce speech sounds via the interaction of different physiological structures. The spectrogram of the audio sample from the show reveals phonemes, which is the basic unit of a languages’ phonology a uniquely human trait.

There are three initiators used in spoken human languages:

The diaphragm together with the ribs and lungs (pulmonic mechanisms),

The glottis (glottalic mechanisms), and

The tongue (lingual or "velaric" mechanisms).

These are the characteristics that a little ghost girl should not have. Therefor "Jackie" or should I say the voice that played Jackie is very much alive.

Time displayed here in minutes| seconds| and thousandths of a second on the hms bar at the top of the spectrogram.

Voice One 0.4 hms

Voice Two 0.28 hms

Voice Three 3.16 hms

These three examples of the alleged voice of "Jackie" within the first three minutes of this episode, clearly show human speech at a distance. 

 A good example is this echo of a living person saying "NOW" 

Human Speech Explained.

This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This blog is for research and educational purposes. This constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in title 17 U.S.C § 107-118. 

Targeting

One of the audio anomalies we have encountered are the many examples of targeting. To gain a better understanding of what is actually happening I tested Olympus 600/700 audio recorders with and without external Sony ECM-DS70P Electret Condenser microphones, showing the anomaly can target its acoustical voice, shown above in the spectrogram. The reason for using external microphones is to reduce noise contamination through the embedded microphones in the body of the recorder. 

Condenser microphones consist of a capacitor with one plate fixed and the other forming the diaphragm moved by sound waves. The inductance of the capacitor’s wire leads is susceptible to RF interference. Although not as much as the dynamic microphone which is far more sensitive to RF contamination. We also tested the fake Sony ECM-DS70P and found them to have a better high frequency response.

When laying out voice recorders in circles, end to end, side to side, directly in front of the researchers. Using both dynamic, and condenser microphones we found the anomaly could target its response. In one experiment when we looked at the audio from the Zoom 360 4-channel microphones it showed a linear path across the room to the researchers’ recorder. We position team members around a table with their recorders directly in front of them showing targeted responses.

Another explanation of targeting described to me by using sound reflection. That sound waves bounce around the room reflecting off the surfaces in the room. Different surfaces absorb frequencies differently, so that some audio recorders would record the sound while others would not depending on location, and the materials nearest the audio device. The sound engineer’s explanation is valid for frequencies of 30dB and higher, but has not taken into account the amplitude of frequencies below -44dB there is a cost of absorption loss when reflecting sound waves at low amplitude would quickly reduce the frequency to zero, supporting a line of sight, other than reflection.

Having an explanation does not necessarily mean there is an absolute conclusion.

A simpler explanation to explain the targeting results for stereo microphones would be a channel failure along with sound reflection if it were not for multiple incidences using different audio recorders. I guess if the answer were easy, we would not call it an anomaly.

The difference between an electronic voice phenomena and a disembodied voice is the amplitude of the sound wave.

There is a frequency threshold between electromagnetic voice phenomena and acoustical voice phenomenon. Which would also explain the results between the dynamic or condenser microphone it’s not so much as being vulnerable to EM frequencies as to which is better at picking up faint low-frequency sound. 

Phillip Brunelle

Aka Phillip Daggett

Phillip Brunelle/Daggett - Blog
Paranormal Criminal Histories
An open letter to Phillip Brunelle

Linkedin - Wedding Photographer
Phillip Brunelle Wedding Photographer
Phillip Brunelle Photography Brockton Massachusetts

"Phillip Brunelle Photography is not a legitimate photographer. Many brides have used his services for wedding photography and never received photographs of their special event. He will attend your event and after payment is received never produce photos. His name is all over the web as a known con artist. He also goes by Phillip Daggett and Phillip Brunelle. He offers another website that is for wedding events and businesses that solicit to people getting married called www.tyingtheknott.com. This guy is out to steal from as many people as he can. Buyer beware."

"What a douche bag! He should have used the money he stole from us at our wedding for photos we never saw to fund his bogus paranormal shenanigans. Geez!"

"Phillip Brunelle Photography aka Phillip Brunelle or Phillip Daggett was contracted by us to shoot wedding photos of our wedding on June 30th, 2011 in Nantucket, MA. Once he received the payment in full, we did not hear from him again. After repeated emails, texts and phone calls he rarely responded and continued to "string us along" saying he had 4-6 weeks per the contract. We waited. Six (6) weeks past and still no photos. It has now been eight (8) weeks and we have still not received photos. He will not respond to us and will not return our money. He also operates a website called www.tyingtheknott.com and www.phillipbrunelle.com. We have researched this business on the internet and found that he has done this to many other brides and grooms. We are heartbroken and feel he should be shut down!"

The people that show up with favorable comments are suspected of being relatives that are listed here.